Methods and systems for internet speed testing

ABSTRACT

Described herein are methods and systems for network performance testing. A computing device may receive a network performance request. The computing device may perform a network performance test, and determine comparable devices of one or more devices associated with the network performance request. The computing device may determine a network performance parameter for the comparable devices, and determine that one or more devices associated with the network performance request are impacting the network performance test.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.17/220,607, filed Apr. 1, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/116,698, filed Aug. 29, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No.10,999,181, issued May 4, 2021, the entire contents of which are hereinincorporated by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

A network performance test determines the speed (e.g., upload speedand/or download speed) and/or latency of a network based on how quicklydata can be transferred between a user device and a computing device(e.g., via the Internet). As an example, when a user requests thenetwork performance test, the download speed is the speed, in bits persecond, that data can be downloaded to the user device from thecomputing device. Similarly, the upload speeds is the speed, in bits persecond, that data can be uploaded to the computing device from the userdevice. For example, a user may navigate to a website to request anetwork performance test that determines the speed of the connectionbetween the user's device and a computing device associated with thewebsite. After the performance test is completed, the user is presentedwith the download speed, upload speed and/or latency that the userdevice was able to achieve. However, if the download speed, the uploadspeed, and/or the latency is below expected values (e.g., below thespeeds the user pays for from an Internet Service Provider), the user isnot provided information related to why the internet connection (e.g.,the download speed, the upload speed, and/or the latency) is below theexpected values. These and other shortcomings are addressed by themethods and systems described herein.

SUMMARY

It is to be understood that both the following general description andthe following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory onlyand are not restrictive. Provided are methods and systems for performinga network performance test. A user device may request a networkperformance test be performed. For example, the user device may transferdata with a computing device to determine results of the networkperformance test. The network performance test may provide the actualresults of the network performance test, as well as expected results ofthe network performance test. The network performance test may furtherindicate that the network performance is negatively impacted by aspecific device(s) associated with the network performance test (e.g.,the user device, a network device, a network connection, the computingdevice, etc.). A recommendation to improve the network performance maybe provided to the user device (e.g., based on the difference betweenthe expected result and the actual result). The recommendation mayinclude one or more recommended changes to one or more settings of thespecific device(s). The one or more recommended changes may also beapplied automatically to improve network performance.

Additional advantages will be set forth in part in the description whichfollows or may be learned by practice. The advantages will be realizedand attained by means of the elements and combinations particularlypointed out in the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this specification, show examples and together with thedescription, serve to explain the principles of the methods and systems:

FIG. 1 is an example of a system;

FIG. 2 is an example of a system;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an example method;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an example method;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an example method; and

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an example computing device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before the present methods and systems are disclosed and described, itis to be understood that the methods and systems are not limited tospecific methods, specific components, or to particular implementations.It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for thepurpose of describing particular examples only and is not intended to belimiting.

As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms“a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearlydictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” oneparticular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When sucha range is expressed, another example includes from the one particularvalue and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values areexpressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it willbe understood that the particular value forms another example. It willbe further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges aresignificant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently ofthe other endpoint.

“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described eventor circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includesexamples where said event or circumstance occurs and examples where itdoes not.

Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the word“comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and“comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intendedto exclude, for example, other components, integers or steps.“Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey anindication of a preferred or ideal example. “Such as” is not used in arestrictive sense, but for explanatory purposes.

Described are components that may be used to perform the describedmethods and systems. These and other components are described herein,and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions,groups, etc. of these components are described that while specificreference of each various individual and collective combinations andpermutation of these may not be explicitly described, each isspecifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods andsystems. This applies to all examples of this application including, butnot limited to, steps in described methods. Thus, if there are a varietyof additional steps that may be performed it is understood that each ofthese additional steps may be performed with any specific example orcombination of examples of the described methods.

The present methods and systems may be understood more readily byreference to the following detailed description of examples and theexamples included therein and to the Figures and their previous andfollowing description.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the methods andsystems may take the form of an entirely hardware example, an entirelysoftware example, or an example combining software and hardware example.Furthermore, the methods and systems may take the form of a computerprogram product on a computer-readable storage medium havingcomputer-readable program instructions (e.g., computer software)embodied in the storage medium. More particularly, the present methodsand systems may take the form of web-implemented computer software. Anysuitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including harddisks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.

Examples of the methods and systems are described below with referenceto block diagrams and flowcharts of methods, systems, apparatuses andcomputer program products. It will be understood that each block of theblock diagrams and flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the blockdiagrams and flowcharts, respectively, may be implemented by computerprogram instructions. These computer program instructions may be loadedonto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such thatthe instructions which execute on the computer or other programmabledata processing apparatus create a means for implementing the functionsspecified in the flowchart block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable memory that may direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablememory produce an article of manufacture including computer-readableinstructions for implementing the function specified in the flowchartblock or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loadedonto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or otherprogrammable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process suchthat the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in theflowchart block or blocks.

Accordingly, blocks of the block diagrams and flowcharts supportcombinations of means for performing the specified functions,combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and programinstruction means for performing the specified functions. It will alsobe understood that each block of the block diagrams and flowcharts, andcombinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flowcharts, may beimplemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems thatperform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of specialpurpose hardware and computer instructions.

In various examples, this detailed disclosure may refer to consumingcontent or to the consumption of content, which may also be referred toas “accessing” content, “providing” content, “viewing” content,“listening” to content, “rendering” content, or “playing” content, amongother things. In some cases, the particular term utilized may bedependent on the context in which it is used. For example, consumingvideo may also be referred to as viewing or playing the video. Inanother example, consuming audio may also be referred to as listening toor playing the audio.

Note that in various examples this detailed disclosure may refer to agiven entity performing some action. It should be understood that thislanguage may in some cases mean that a system (e.g., a computer) ownedand/or controlled by the given entity is actually performing the action.

Methods and systems are described for performing a network performancetest. For example, a user device may request that the networkperformance test be performed to determine characteristics of the userdevice's network connection (e.g., internet connection). The request mayidentify the user device and at least one network device associated withthe user device. As an example, the network performance test may be aninternet speed test that determines the download speed, the uploadspeed, and/or the latency of the user device and a network device. Thenetwork performance test may be accessed via a web-based tool and/or asoftware client on a gateway device. The results of the networkperformance test may be analyzed based on comparable user devices andcomparable network devices that have similar capabilities to the userdevice and the network device to determine whether the user deviceand/or the network device are impacting the network performance test.Further, the capabilities of the user device being tested and thenetwork device (e.g., a local gateway) can be learned and transmitted tothe computing device for analysis. Additionally, the network speed testcan take into account Wi-Fi environment data. Wi-Fi environment data caninclude, for example, how many other Access Points (e.g., neighbors'access points) the gateway can detect, how many devices are connected tothe gateway, the wireless protocol of the gateway, the number ofwireless antennas of the gateway, and interference detected by thegateway. The Wi-Fi environment data can be maintained and assessed todetermine the load on the wireless network.

Crowd sourced data related to one or more other speed tests may begathered, maintained, and accessed to determine which of the crowdsourced data may be relevant to the particular test. For example, adatabase may contain crowd sourced data related to a plurality of userdevices and a plurality of network devices. The crowd sourced data mayinclude the hardware characteristics of the devices (e.g., processor,network interface, memory, etc.) and software characteristics of thedevice (e.g., operating system, firmware, etc.). The crowd sourced datamay be collected and stored after the plurality of user devices requestrespective network performance tests. The results of the networkperformance test requested by the user device may be analyzed based onthe crowd sourced data in the database to determine if the networkperformance is impacted by the user device and/or the network device.For example, the crowd sourced data may be used to determine an expectedresult of the network performance test. The expected result of thenetwork performance test may be compared to the actual results of thenetwork performance test to determine whether a device is negativelyimpacting the network connection of the user device. As an example, theuser device and/or the network device may negatively impact theperformance test, which indicates that the user device is unable tofully utilize the network connection. A recommendation may be providedto the user device to facilitate improving the network connection forthe user device.

FIG. 1 shows an example system 100 in which the present methods andsystems may operate. In an example, one or more network devices may beconfigured to provide various services to one or more devices, such asdevices located at or near a premises. In another example, the networkdevices may be configured to provide internet service for the premisesand/or a particular service or services available at the premises. Thoseskilled in the art will appreciate that present methods may beimplemented in various types of networks and systems that employ bothdigital and analog equipment. One skilled in the art will appreciatethat provided herein is a functional description and that the respectivefunctions may be performed by software, hardware, or a combination ofsoftware and hardware.

The system 100 may comprise a user device 102 in communication with acomputing device 104 such as a server, for example. The computing device104 may be disposed locally or remotely relative to the user device 102.As an example, the user device 102 and the computing device 104 may bein communication via a private and/or public network 105 such as theInternet or a local area network. Other forms of communications may beused such as wired and wireless telecommunication channels, for example.

In an example, the user device 102 may be an electronic device such as acomputer, a smartphone, a laptop, a tablet, a set top box, a displaydevice, or other device capable of communicating with the computingdevice 104. As an example, the user device 102 may comprise acommunication element 106 for providing an interface to a user tointeract with the user device 102 and/or the computing device 104. Thecommunication element 106 may be any interface for presenting and/orreceiving information to/from the user, such as user feedback. Anexample interface may be a communication interface such as a web browser(e.g., Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, or thelike). Other software, hardware, and/or interfaces may be used toprovide communication between the user and one or more of the userdevice 102 and the computing device 104. As an example, thecommunication element 106 may request a network performance test. Asanother example, the communication element 106 may transmit data to thecomputing device 104 to facilitate the network performance test.

In an example, the user device 102 may be associated with a useridentifier or device identifier 108. As an example, the deviceidentifier 108 may be any identifier, token, character, string, or thelike, for differentiating one user or user device (e.g., user device102) from another user or user device. In a further example, the deviceidentifier 108 may identify a user or user device as belonging to aparticular class of users or user devices. As another example, thedevice identifier 108 may comprise information relating to the userdevice such as a manufacturer, a model or type of device, a serviceprovider associated with the user device 102, a state of the user device102, a locator, and/or a label or classifier. Other information may berepresented by the device identifier 108.

In an example, the device identifier 108 may comprise an address element110 and a service element 112. In an example, the address element 110may comprise or provide an internet protocol address, a network address,a media access control (MAC) address, an Internet address, or the like.As an example, the address element 110 may be relied upon to establish acommunication session between the user device 102 and the computingdevice 104 or other devices and/or networks. For example, the addresselement 100 may be used to perform a network performance test betweenthe user device 102 and the computing device 104. As a further example,the address element 110 may be used as an identifier or locator of theuser device 102. In an example, the address element 110 may bepersistent for a particular network.

In an example, the service element 112 may comprise an identificationprovided by a service provider associated with the user device 102and/or with the class of user device 102. The class of the user device102 may be related to a type of device, capability of device, type ofservice being provided, and/or a level of service (e.g., business class,service tier, service package, etc.). As an example, the service element112 may comprise information relating to or provided by a communicationservice provider (e.g., Internet Service Provider) that is providing orenabling data flow such as communication services (e.g., an Internetconnect) to the user device 102. As a further example, the serviceelement 112 may comprise information relating to a service provider forone or more particular services relating to the user device 102. In anexample, the address element 110 may be used to identify or retrievedata from the service element 112, or vice versa. As a further example,one or more of the address element 110 and the service element 112 maybe stored remotely from the user device 102 and retrieved by one or moredevices such as the user device 102 and the computing device 104. Otherinformation may be represented by the service element 112.

In an example, the computing device 104 may be a server forcommunicating with the user device 102. As an example, the computingdevice 104 may communicate with the user device 102 for providing dataand/or services. As an example, the computing device 104 may provideservices such as network (e.g., Internet) connectivity, networkprinting, media management (e.g., media server), content services,streaming services, broadband services, or other network-relatedservices. In an example, the computing device 104 may allow the userdevice 102 to interact with remote resources such as data, devices, andfiles. As an example, the computing device may be configured as (ordisposed at) a central location (e.g., a headend, or processingfacility), which may receive content (e.g., data, input programming)from multiple sources. The computing device 104 may combine the contentfrom the multiple sources and may distribute the content to user (e.g.,subscriber) locations via a distribution system. As a further example,the computing device 104 may provide a network performance test to theuser device 102 to determine the performance of the network between theuser device 102 and the computing device 104.

In an example, one or more network devices 116 may be in communicationwith a network such as network 105. As an example, the network device116 may facilitate the connection of a device, such as user device 102,to the network 105. As a further example, the network device 116 may beconfigured as a wireless access point (WAP). In an example, the networkdevice 116 may be configured to allow one or more wireless devices toconnect to a wired and/or wireless network using Wi-Fi, Bluetooth or anydesired method or standard.

In an example, the network device 116 may be configured as a local areanetwork (LAN). As an example, the network device 116 may comprise a dualband wireless access point. As an example, the network device 116 may beconfigured with a first service set identifier (SSID) (e.g., associatedwith a user network or private network) to function as a local networkfor a particular user or users. As a further example, the network device116 may be configured with a second service set identifier (SSID) (e.g.,associated with a public/community network or a hidden network) tofunction as a secondary network or redundant network for connectedcommunication devices.

In an example, the network device 116 may comprise an identifier 118. Asan example, one or more identifiers may be or relate to an InternetProtocol (IP) Address IPV4/IPV6 or a media access control address (MACaddress) or the like. As a further example, one or more identifiers 118may be a unique identifier for facilitating communications on thephysical network segment. As an example, the identifier 118 may beassociated with a physical location of the network device 116. In anexample, a plurality of the network devices 116 may each comprise adistinct identifier 118.

In an example, the network device 116 may comprise communicationssoftware 120 that controls operation of the network device 116, as wellas communicating with other devices (e.g., the user device 102, thecomputing device 104). The communications software 120 may includesettings of the network device 116. For example, the communicationssoftware 120 may include an operating system that controls the networkdevice 116. For example, the network device 116 may be a wireless accesspoint and the communications software 120 comprises the informationrelated to operating the wireless network provided by the network device116. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, thecommunications software 120 may be any combination of firmware and/orsoftware for controlling operation of the network device 116, as well ascommunicating with other devices (e.g., the user device 102, thecomputing device 104).

In an example, the communications software 120 may allow the networkdevice 116 to communicate settings and/or operating characteristics ofthe network device 116 to the user device 102 and/or computing device104. As an example, the computing device 104 may request informationabout the communications software 120. For example, the computing device104 may request the current operating system for the network device 116to ensure that the communications software 120 is up to date. As anotherexample, the computing device 104 may request the current operatingsettings of the network device 116 to ensure the network device 116 isoperating with the optimal settings.

In an example, the communications software 120 may be updated. Forexample, the user device 102 and/or the computing device 104 maytransmit updated communications software 120 to the network device 116.After receiving the updated communications software 120, the networkdevice 116 updates the communications software 120. The updatedcommunications software 120 may comprise new settings, new software, andso forth. As an example, the computing device 104 may transmit newsettings to the network device 116 after determining the network device116 is not operating under the optimal settings. As another example, thenetwork device 116 may automatically update the communications software120. For example, the network device 116 may request updated settingsand/or software from another device (e.g., the user device 102, thecomputing device 104). The network device 116 may automatically updatethe communications software 120 after receiving the updated settingsand/or software.

The computing device 104 may manage the communication between the userdevice 102 and a database 114 for sending and receiving datatherebetween. The database 114 may store a plurality of files (e.g., webpages), user identifiers or records, or other information. The userdevice 102 may request and/or retrieve a file from the database 114. Thedatabase 114 may store information relating to the user device 102 suchas the address element 110 and/or the service element 112. The computingdevice 104 may obtain the device identifier 108 from the user device 102and retrieve information from the database 114 such as the addresselement 110 and/or the service elements 112. The computing device 104may obtain the address element 110 from the user device 102 and mayretrieve the service element 112 from the database 114, or vice versa.Any information may be stored in and retrieved from the database 114.The database 114 may be disposed remotely from the computing device 104and accessed via direct or indirect connection. The database 114 may beintegrated with the computing device 104 or some other device or system.

The computing device 104 may provide network testing services to theuser device 102. The user device 102 may request a network performancetest (e.g., an Internet Speed Test) that determines the communicationscapability of the network (e.g., the speed of the connection) betweenthe computing device 104 and the user device 102. The networkperformance test may be accessed via a web-based tool and/or a softwareclient on a network device. For example, the web-based tool may beaccessible via a website offering the network performance test. A userof the user device 102 may access the web-based tool through the network105 to request the network performance test. As another example, thenetwork device 116 can include the functionality to perform the networkperformance test. The user of the user device 102 may request thenetwork performance test form the network device 116. The network device116 may communicate with the computing device 104 to complete thenetwork performance test.

The network performance test may determine whether the user device 102,the network device 116, and/or the network 105 are preventing the userdevice 102 from maximizing the network speed (e.g., the speed of theuser's Internet connection). For example, the user device 102 maytransmit and/or receive data to/from the computing device 104. Thecomputing device 104 transmits a packet via the network 105 and thenetwork device 116 to the user device 102. In an example, the computingdevice 104 determines a latency between the computing device 104 and theuser device 102 by sending a packet comprising time data to the userdevice 102 to determine a length of time for the packet to be receivedby the user device 102. In another example, the result of the networkperformance test is the speed (e.g., megabytes per second (MB/s)) of thetransfer between the computing device 104 and the user device 102. Forexample, the computing device 104 may transmit a predetermined size ofdata to the user device 102, and then based on a length of time for thetransmission to complete, determine results of the network performancetest in terms of upload speed, download speed, and/or latency. Forexample, the result of the network performance test may be that the userdevice 102 may achieve a download speed of 45 MB/s, an upload speed of 7MB/s, and a 10 ms latency. While the example is explained as thecomputing device 104 transmitting a packet to the user device 102 forease of explanation, a person skilled in the art would appreciate theuser device 102 may also transmit the packet in order to perform thenetwork performance test. Further, both the computing device 104 and theuser device 102 may transmit and/or receive a request to perform thenetwork performance test.

The computing device 104 communicates results of the network test to theuser device 102. The computing device 104 communicates ways to improvethe results of the network test to the user device 102. The computingdevice 104 communicates updated communications software 120 to thenetwork device 116 to improve the results of the network test.

The computing device 104 can store network performance data 122 withinthe database 114. The network performance data 122 can compriseperformance data of the user device 102, the network 105, the networkdevice 116, and/or the computing device 104. The network performancedata 122 can also comprise characteristics of the user device 102, thenetwork 105, and the network device 116. For example, the networkperformance data 122 may include the hardware (e.g., processor, memory,battery, network interface, manufacturer, model number, etc.) and/orsoftware (e.g., operating system, firmware, etc.) characteristics of theplurality of devices. A search of the database may be performed toidentify data related to the user device 102 requesting the performancetest.

The network performance data 122 can be crowd sourced data that isdetermined from the plurality of devices requesting a networkperformance test. For example, the computing device 104 (or othercomputing device) may execute (or cause execution of) a plurality ofnetwork performance tests for a plurality of different network devices116 and a plurality of different user devices 102. The computing device140 can receive and/or store the results of the plurality of networkperformance tests in the network performance data 122. The results ofthe plurality of network performance tests may be stored based on theidentifier of the devices (e.g., the device identifier 108, theidentifier 118). As an example, the computing device 104 may execute anetwork performance test for a plurality of users of an Internet ServiceProvider. The users can be located at different respective locations(e.g., each user's house, place of business, an associates house, etc.).Each of the users may have a respective user device 102 and a respectivenetwork device 116 associated with the user. Accordingly, the results ofthe network performance test will contain information related to therespective user device 102 and the respective network device 116. Thus,the network performance data 122 contains information related to aplurality of user devices 102 and a plurality of network devices 116from a plurality of different locations.

The computing device 104 (or other computing device) can use networkperformance data 122 stored in the database related to the comparabledevices to determine a network performance parameter of a comparabledevice to a user device 102 requesting the network performance test. Thenetwork performance parameter may be any parameter that impacts thenetwork connection of the comparable device. The network performanceparameter may be the maximum download speed and/or maximum upload speedthat the comparable devices are capable of. For example, the networkperformance parameter of a comparable user device can be a maximumdownload and upload speed of 200 MB/s. As another example, the networkperformance parameter of a comparable network device can be a maximumdownload and upload speed of 600 MB/s. The computing device 104 (orother computing device) can use the network performance parameter of thecomparable network device to determine an expected result for thenetwork performance test requested by the user device 102. Thus, thecomputing device 104 can use the network performance data 122 whileperforming the network performance test.

FIG. 2 shows an example system 200. The example system 200 includes apremises 202 having a network device 116, a wireless access point 204,and user devices 102 a, 102 b, and 102 c. In an example, the networkdevice 116 may be configured to communicate with the network 105. Thenetwork device 116 may comprise a modem (e.g., cable modem), a router, agateway, a switch, a network terminal (e.g., optical network unit),and/or the like. The network device 116 may be configured forcommunication with the network 105 via a variety of protocols, such asinternet protocol, transmission control protocol, file transferprotocol, session initiation protocol, voice over internet protocol,and/or the like. For example, for a cable network, the network device116 may be configured to provide network access via a variety ofcommunication protocols and standards, such as Data Over Cable ServiceInterface Specification (DOCSIS).

The wireless access point 204 may be configured to provide one or morewireless networks in at least a portion of the premises 202. Thewireless access point 204 may be configured to provide access to thenetwork 105 via the network device 116 to devices configured with acompatible wireless radio, such as a user devices 102 a, 102 b, and 102c. For example, the wireless access point 204 may provide a user managednetwork (e.g., local area network), a service provider managed network(e.g., public network for users of the service provider), and/or thelike. While the wireless access point 204 is shown as a separate devicefor ease of explanation, a person skilled in the art would appreciatethat the network device 116 may include the functionality of thewireless access point 204.

The user devices 102 a, 102 b, and 102 c may request a networkperformance test. The user device 102 a can transmit and receive datato/from the network 105 via the wireless access point 204 and thenetwork device 116. As an example, the user device 102 a receives and/ortransmits a packet via the network 105, the network device 116, and thewireless access point 204 to the user device 102. A latency between theuser device 102 a and the network 105 may be determined by sending apacket comprising time data to the user device 102 a to determine thelength of time for the packet to be received by the user device 102 a.The result of the network performance test may be the speed (e.g.,megabytes per second (MB/s)) of the transfer between the network 105 andthe user device 102 a. For example, the user device 102 a may transmitand/or receive a predetermined size of data to/from the network 105 viathe via the wireless access point 204 and the network device 116, andthen based on a length of time for the transmission to complete, resultsof the network performance test in terms of upload speed, downloadspeed, and/or latency may be determined. For example, the result of thenetwork performance test may be that the user device 102 a may achieve adownload speed 45 MB/s, an upload speed of 7 MB/s, and a 10 ms latencyvia the wireless access point 204 and the network device 116.

However, a wireless network provides additional challenges for thenetwork performance test. For example, the channel (e.g., 2.4 GHz, 5GHz) used by the device requesting the network performance test mayimpact the results. As another example, the user device 102 a may belocated at the maximum range that the wireless access point 204 canreliably provide service. Thus, the location of the user device 102 amay impact the network performance test because the signal strength(e.g., Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI)) may be below anoptimal threshold. Accordingly, the network performance test may takeinto account the signal strength of the device requesting the networkperformance test. For example, if the RSSI of the user device 102 a islow, that will directly impact the throughput (e.g., connection speed,network performance) the user device 102 a is capable of achieving.Thus, the network performance test can use the RSSI of the user device102 a in determining whether the RSSI is impacting the networkperformance test. In the event the RSSI of the user device 102 a is lowenough to impact the network performance test, the network performancetest may recommend moving the user device 102 a closer to the wirelessaccess point 204 in order to improve the RSSI, which will improve thenetwork performance seen by the user device 102 a.

The other devices (e.g., user devices 102 b, and 102 c) using thewireless access point 204 can have an impact on the network performancetest. For example, the user devices 102 b and 102 c may be streamingcontent from a content provider which requires significant bandwidth,which in turn impacts the bandwidth of the wireless network provided bythe wireless access point 204. Accordingly, the network performance testmay be negatively impacted. Thus, the network performance test can takeinto account Wi-Fi environment data. Wi-Fi environment data can include,for example, how many other Access Points (e.g., neighbors' accesspoints) the wireless access point 204 can detect, how many devices areconnected to the wireless access point 204, the wireless protocol of thewireless access point 204, the number of wireless antennas of thewireless access point 204, and interference detected by the wirelessaccess point 204. The Wi-Fi environment data can be maintained andassessed to determine the load on the wireless network.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an example method 300. At step 310, networkperformance data (e.g., network performance data 122) may be received bya computing device (e.g., by the computing device 104). The computingdevice can receive the network performance data from a database (e.g.,the database 114). For example, the database can be a central repositorywhere a plurality of computing devices can store, or receive, thenetwork performance data. The network performance data may includeinformation related to a specific device's capability. The specificdevice can be one or more devices involved in the transfer of databetween a user device and the computing device, including the userdevice and the computing device. In an example, the specific device maybe a laptop and the network performance data may include information ofcharacteristics of the laptop that may impact network performance. Thenetwork performance data may include the hardware characteristics of thedevice, such as processor, memory (e.g., volatile and non-volatilememory), network interface, network capability (e.g., download speed,upload speed, latency), and so forth. Further, the network performancedata may include the software characteristics of the device, such asoperating system, firmware, applications running on the laptop, and soforth. The software characteristics and hardware characteristics of thedevice may be referred to as a specification of the device.

As an example, the specific device may be a laptop that has a processoroperating at 2.2 GHz, 4 GB of Random Access Memory (RAM), a network cardcapable of download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s, a network connectionof the laptop (e.g., wireless or wired), the version of the operatingsystem executing on the laptop, any applications running on the laptop,and information related to the firmware executing on the laptop. Thenetwork performance data may also include general information of thelaptop that may not directly impact network performance. For example,the general information may include an identifier associated with thelaptop (e.g., device identifier 108), the age of the laptop, themanufacturer of the laptop, the display size of the laptop, informationrelated to a user of the laptop, and any peripheral devices incommunication with the laptop.

The network performance data can include data related to a plurality ofuser devices (e.g., a plurality of the user device 102) and a pluralityof network devices (e.g., the network device 116). The networkperformance data can include data related to one or more of the userdevices that have requested a network performance test, as well as thenetwork devices associated with the user devices. As an example, if fivedifferent user devices request a network performance test, the networkperformance data of the five different user devices can be stored. Thenetwork performance data can be crowd sourced data that is captured overtime as devices request network performance tests.

At step 320, a network performance request may be received (e.g., by thecomputing device 104) from a user device (e.g., the user device 102).The network performance request may include an identifier of the userdevice (e.g., device identifier 108) and/or an identifier of a networkdevice (e.g., identifier 118 of the network device 116). The request caninclude parameters for operating the network performance test. Theparameters can indicate one or more preferences of a user of the userdevice for performing the network performance test. Parameters caninclude, for example, a location of the computing device performing thenetwork performance test, an expected speed of the network performancetest, a size of data to test, and a length of time to conduct thenetwork performance test. For example, the user device may indicate alocation of the computing device that the user device would like toperform the network performance test.

At step 330, a network performance test can be performed by thecomputing device. The user device may transmit and receive data to/fromthe computing device. The computing device can determine a latencybetween the computing device and the user device by sending a packetcomprising time data to the user device to determine the length of timefor the packet to be received by the user device. For example, the timedata may include a universal time stamp that indicates the time thepacket was sent from the computing device. The user device and/or thecomputing device can compare the universal time stamp in the packet tothe universal time stamp at the time the packet was received todetermine the length of time the packet traveled from the computingdevice to the user device in order to determine the latency. As anotherexample, the time data may include a local time stamp of the computingdevice. Upon receiving the packet, the user device can transmit thepacket back (e.g., reply, respond) to the computing device. Afterreceiving the packet from the user device, the computing device can thencompare the current local time with the local time stamp within thepacket to determine the length of time the packet traveled from thecomputing device to the user device in order to determine the latency.

The result of the network performance test can be the speed (e.g.,megabytes per second (MB/s)) of the transfer between the computingdevice and the user device. For example, the computing device maytransmit a predetermined size of data to the user device, and then basedon a length of time for the transmission to complete, determine resultsof the network performance test in terms of upload speed, downloadspeed, and/or latency. As an example, the result of the networkperformance test may be that the user device may achieve a downloadspeed 50 MB/s, an upload speed of 5 MB/s, and a 5 ms latency.

At step 340, one or more comparable user devices can be determined bythe computing device. The computing device can search stored networkperformance data (e.g., the network performance data 122) to determinecomparable devices that are similar to the user device that requestedthe network performance test. As an example, the stored networkperformance data may be searched for comparable devices that have thesame or similar device identifier (e.g., the device identifier 108) asthe user device. A device may be considered comparable to the userdevice based on a plurality of characteristics (e.g., a specification ofthe device) that the comparable device and the user device have incommon. The similarities may be drawn between hardware (e.g., processor,memory, battery, network interface, manufacturer, model number, etc.)and/or software (e.g., operating system, firmware, etc.). Further, aperson skilled in the art would appreciate the comparable device mayhave characteristics that are identical to the user device. Whilecomparable has been used for ease of explanation, a person skilled inthe art will appreciate that comparable is interchangeable with otherterms such as similar, related, like, relative, analogous, approximate,close, and so forth.

As an example of a comparable device, the user device may be a laptopthat has a processor operating at 2.2 GHz, 4 GB of Random Access Memory(RAM), a network card capable of download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s,and a wireless network connection. A comparable device to the laptop maybe a different laptop having a processor operating at 2.0 GHz, 6 GB ofRAM, a network card capable of download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s,and a wireless network connection. While the characteristics between thetwo laptops are slightly different, the computing device may recognizethat the differences are minor and will likely not impact the networkperformance test because the two laptops have the same download andupload capability. Stated differently, even though the two laptops aredifferent, the computing device determines that the two laptops may havethe same network performance test results with all else being equalduring the network performance test. Accordingly, even though the twolaptops are not identical, the two laptops are comparable to oneanother.

At step 350, one or more comparable network devices can be determined bythe computing device (e.g., by the computing device 104). The computingdevice can search stored network performance data (e.g., the networkperformance data 122) to determine comparable network devices that aresimilar to the network device identified in the request for the networkperformance test. As an example, the stored network performance data maybe searched for comparable network devices that have the same or similardevice identifier (e.g., the identifier 118) as the identified networkdevice. A network device may be considered comparable to the identifiednetwork device based on a plurality of characteristics that thecomparable network device and the identified network device have incommon. For example, the similarities may be drawn between hardware(e.g., processor, memory, number of antennas, number of communicationschannels, network interface, Data Over Cable Service InterfaceSpecification (DOCSIS) Version, manufacturer, model number, etc.) and/orsoftware (e.g., operating system, firmware, etc.). Further, a personskilled in the art would appreciate the comparable network device mayhave characteristics that are identical to the identified networkdevice.

As an example of a comparable network device, the identified networkdevice may be a gateway that has a processor operating at 1.3 GHz, 2 GBof RAM, 16 download channels, 4 upload channels, and provides a wirelessnetwork operating at 2.4 GHz. A comparable device to the identifiednetwork device may be a different network device having a processoroperating at 1.0 GHz, 2 GB of RAM, 16 download channels, 4 uploadchannels, and provides a wireless network at 5.0 GHz. While thecharacteristics between the two network devices are slightly different,the computing device may recognize that the differences are minor andwill likely not impact the network performance test because the twonetwork devices have the same number of download and upload channels.Stated differently, even though the two network devices are different,the computing device determines that the two network devices may havethe same network performance test results with all else being equalduring the network performance test. Accordingly, even though the twonetwork devices are not identical, the two network devices arecomparable to one another.

At step 360, a network performance parameter of the one or morecomparable user devices and network devices can be determined by thecomputing device (e.g., by the computing device 104). The computingdevice can use the network performance data stored in the databaserelated to the comparable devices to determine a network performanceparameter for the comparable devices. The network performance parametermay be any parameter that impacts the network connection of the device.The network performance parameter may be the maximum download speedand/or maximum upload speed that the comparable devices are capable of.For example, the network performance parameter of a comparable userdevice can be a maximum download and upload speed of 200 MB/s. Asanother example, the network performance parameter of a comparablenetwork device can be a maximum download and upload speed of 600 MB/s.While a maximum download and upload speed are used for ease ofexplanation, a person skilled in the art would appreciate that anynetwork performance parameter may be determined.

At step 370, the computing device (e.g., the computing device 104) maydetermine whether the user device, the network device, or neither isnegatively impacting the network performance test. The computing devicemay apply the maximum download speeds of the comparable devices to theuser device and the network device to determine a bottleneck in thesystem. For example, the result of the network performance test may becompared to the network performance parameters of the comparable userdevice and the comparable network device to determine if one of thedevices is acting as a bottleneck.

As an example, the comparable user device may have a maximum downloadspeed of 200 MB/s, the comparable network device may have a maximumdownload speed of 50 MB/s, and the network device may be connected to acommunications network that has a download speed of 100 MB/s. Thenetwork performance test may have a result of a download speed of 50MB/s. Since the communications network has a maximum download speed of100 MB/s, and the result of 50 MB/s is less than the maximum, and thecomputing device may determine that the network device or the userdevice is the bottleneck preventing the maximum download speed. Thecomputing device may evaluate the maximum download speeds of thecomparable user device and the comparable network device to determine ifthe user device or the network device is the bottleneck of the system.As stated above, the comparable network device has a maximum downloadspeed of 50 MB/s, and the comparable user device has a maximum downloadspeed of 200 MB/s. Thus, the computing device may infer that the networkdevice is the bottleneck and is impacting the network performance testbecause the maximum download speed of 50 MB/s of the comparable networkdevice directly correlates to the result of the network performancetest. Therefore, the computing device may determine the network deviceis negatively impacting the results of the network performance testbased on the comparable network device's network performance parameter.

As another example, the computing device may not have information of thecapabilities of the communications network in communication with thenetwork device. The comparable user device may have a maximum downloadspeed of 200 MB/s and the comparable network device may have a maximumdownload speed of 250 MB/s. The network performance test may have aresult of a download speed of 150 MB/s. Since the comparable deviceseach have a maximum download speed over 150 MB/s, the computing devicemay determine that the communications network is the bottleneckpreventing the maximum download speed.

The computing device can provide a recommendation on how to improve thenetwork performance test. For example, if the network device is thebottleneck, the recommendation may include information of how to updatethe software and/or firmware of the network device. The computing devicemay automatically update the software and/or firmware of the networkdevice and/or the user device to improve the network performance (e.g.,via an Application Programming Interface (API)). As another example, ifthe network device's physical capabilities are maximized, the computingdevice may recommend replacing the network device with a newer devicewith better capabilities. As a further example, if the communicationsnetwork is the bottleneck, the computing device may recommend upgradingthe internet service of the user device to improve the networkperformance test.

The recommendation from the computing device may include adjusting oneor more settings of the user device and/or the network device. Thesettings may include power settings, settings related to a number ofdevices permitted to access a network device, changing a channel ofoperation (e.g., 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, etc.), modifying the channel ofoperation (e.g., if 2.4 GHz, modifying to 2.412 GHz, 2.417 GHz, 2.422GHz, etc.), activating and/or deactivating a wireless extender,activating and/or deactivating traffic shaping (e.g., beamforming),controlling bandwidth allocations for one or more devices, controllingdownload and/or upload speeds for one or more devices, security settings(e.g., firewall, anti-virus), or any setting related to the operation ofthe user device, the network device, and/or the network. The computingdevice can automatically adjust one or more of the settings on thenetwork device and/or the user device in order to improve the networkperformance.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an example method 400. At step 410, networkperformance data (e.g., network performance data 122) is received by acomputing device (e.g., by the computing device 104). The computingdevice may receive the network performance data from a database (e.g.,the database 114). For example, the database can be a central repositorywhere a plurality of computing devices can store, or receive, thenetwork performance data. The network performance data can includeinformation related to a specific device's capability. The device may bea laptop and the network performance data may include information ofcharacteristics of the laptop that may impact network performance. Forexample, the network performance data may include the hardwarecharacteristics of the device, such as processor, memory (e.g., volatileand non-volatile memory), network interface, network capability (e.g.,download speed, upload speed, latency), and so forth. Further, thenetwork performance data may include the software characteristics of thedevice, such as operating system, firmware, applications running on thelaptop, and so forth.

As an example, the device may be a laptop that has a processor operatingat 2.2 GHz, 4 GB of Random Access Memory (RAM), a network card capableof download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s, a network connection of thelaptop (e.g., wireless or wired), the version of the operating systemexecuting on the laptop, any applications running on the laptop, andinformation of the firmware executing on the laptop. The networkperformance data may also include general information of the laptop thatmay not directly impact network performance. The general information mayinclude an identifier associated with the laptop (e.g., deviceidentifier 108), the age of the laptop, the manufacturer of the laptop,the display size of the laptop, information related to a user of thelaptop, and any peripheral devices in communication with the laptop.

The network performance data may include data related a plurality ofuser devices (e.g., a plurality of the user device 102) and a pluralityof network devices (e.g., the network device 116). The networkperformance data may include data related to one or more of the userdevices that have requested a network performance test, as well as thenetwork devices associated with the user devices. As an example, if fivedifferent user devices request a network performance test, the networkperformance data of the five different user devices is stored. Thenetwork performance data can be crowd sourced data that is captured overtime as devices request network performance tests.

At step 420, a network performance request is received (e.g., by thecomputing device 104) from a user device (e.g., the user device 102).The network performance request includes an identifier of the userdevice (e.g., device identifier 108) and an identifier of a networkdevice (e.g., identifier 118 of the network device 116). The request caninclude parameters for running the network performance test. Theparameters can indicate one or more preferences of a user of the userdevice for performing the network performance test. Parameters caninclude, for example, a location of the computing device performing thenetwork performance test, an expected speed of the network performancetest, a size of data to test, and a length of time to conduct thenetwork performance test. For example, the user device may indicate alocation of the computing device that the user device would like toperform the network performance test.

At step 430, a network performance test is performed by the computingdevice. The user device may receive and transmit data between thecomputing device. The computing device can determine a latency betweenthe computing device and the user device by sending a packet comprisingtime data to the user device to determine the length of time for thepacket to be received by the user device. For example, the time data mayinclude a universal time stamp that indicates the time the packet wassent from the computing device. The user device and/or the computingdevice can compare the universal time stamp in the packet to theuniversal time stamp at the time the packet was received to determinethe length of time the packet traveled from the computing device to theuser device in order to determine the latency. As another example, thetime data may include a local time stamp of the computing device. Uponreceiving the packet, the user device can transmit the packet back(e.g., reply, respond) to the computing device. After receiving thepacket from the user device, the computing device can then compare thecurrent local time with the local time stamp within the packet todetermine the length of time the packet traveled from the computingdevice to the user device in order to determine the latency.

The result of the network performance test may be the speed (e.g.,megabytes per second (MB/s)) of the transfer between the computingdevice and the user device. For example, the computing device maytransmit a predetermined size of data to the user device, and then basedon a length of time for the transmission to complete, determine resultsof the network performance test in terms of upload speed, downloadspeed, and/or latency. The result of the network performance test may bethat the user device may achieve a download speed 50 MB/s, an uploadspeed of 5 MB/s, and a 5 ms latency.

At step 440, one or more comparable user devices are determined by thecomputing device. The computing device may search stored networkperformance data (e.g., the network performance data 122) to determinecomparable devices that are similar to the user device that requestedthe network performance test. The stored network performance data can besearched for comparable devices that have the same or similar deviceidentifier (e.g., the device identifier 108) as the user device. Adevice may be considered comparable to the user device based on aplurality of characteristics that the comparable device and the userdevice have in common. For example, the similarities may be drawnbetween hardware (e.g., processor, memory, battery, network interface,manufacturer, model number, etc.) and/or software (e.g., operatingsystem, firmware, etc.). Further, a person skilled in the art wouldappreciate the comparable device may have characteristics that areidentical to the user device. While comparable has been used for ease ofexplanation, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that comparableis interchangeable with other terms such as similar, related, like,relative, analogous, approximate, close, and so forth.

As an example of a comparable device, the user device may be a laptopthat has a processor operating at 2.2 GHz, 4 GB of Random Access Memory(RAM), a network card capable of download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s,and a wireless network connection. A comparable device to the laptop maybe a different laptop having a processor operating at 2.0 GHz, 6 GB ofRAM, a network card capable of download and upload speeds of 200 MB/s,and a wireless network connection. While the characteristics between thetwo laptops are slightly different, the computing device may recognizethat the differences are minor and will likely not impact the networkperformance test because the two laptops have the same download andupload capability. Stated differently, even though the two laptops aredifferent, the computing device determines that the two laptops may havethe same network performance test results with all else being equalduring the network performance test. Accordingly, even though the twolaptops are not identical, the two laptops are comparable to oneanother.

At step 450, one or more comparable network devices are determined bythe computing device (e.g., by the computing device 104). The computingdevice can search stored network performance data (e.g., the networkperformance data 122) to determine comparable network devices that aresimilar to the network device identified in the request for the networkperformance test. The stored network performance data may be searchedfor comparable network devices that have the same or similar deviceidentifier (e.g., the identifier 118) as the identified network device.A network device may be considered comparable to the identified networkdevice based on a plurality of characteristics that the comparablenetwork device and the identified network device have in common. Forexample, the similarities may be drawn between hardware (e.g.,processor, memory, number of antennas, number of communicationschannels, network interface, Data Over Cable Service InterfaceSpecification (DOCSIS) Version, manufacturer, model number, etc.) and/orsoftware (e.g., operating system, firmware, etc.). Further, a personskilled in the art would appreciate the comparable network device mayhave characteristics that are identical to the identified networkdevice.

As an example of a comparable network device, the identified networkdevice may be a gateway that has a processor operating at 1.3 GHz, 2 GBof RAM, 16 download channels, 4 upload channels, and provides a wirelessnetwork operating at 2.4 GHz. A comparable device to the identifiednetwork device may be a different network device having a processoroperating at 1.0 GHz, 2 GB of RAM, 16 download channels, 4 uploadchannels, and provides a wireless network at 5.0 GHz. While thecharacteristics between the two network devices are slightly different,the computing device may recognize that the differences are minor andwill likely not impact the network performance test because the twonetwork devices have the same number of download and upload channels.Stated differently, even though the two network devices are different,the computing device determines that the two network devices may havethe same network performance test results with all else being equalduring the network performance test. Accordingly, even though the twonetwork devices are not identical, the two network devices arecomparable to one another.

At step 460, an expected performance parameter of the user device isdetermined by the computing device. The computing device can use thenetwork performance data stored in the database to determine an expectedperformance parameter for the user device. The expected performanceparameter may be the maximum download speed and/or maximum upload speedthat the user device is capable of. For example, the computing devicemay determine that devices comparable to the user device have a maximumdownload and upload speed of 200 MB/s. Thus, the computing device mayinfer that the user device has a similar maximum download and uploadspeed as the comparable devices, and expect that the user device wouldachieve 200 MB/s downloading, as well as uploading, if there are noother bottlenecks. Accordingly, the computing device may determine theuser device has an expected maximum download and upload speed of 200MB/s. While a maximum download and upload speed are used for ease ofexplanation, a person skilled in the art would appreciate that anynetwork performance parameter may be determined.

At step 470, the computing device (e.g., the computing device 104) candetermine whether the user device and/or the network device isnegatively impacting the network performance test. The result of thenetwork performance test may be compared to the expected performanceparameter of the user device and the performance parameter of thecomparable network device to determine if one of the devices is actingas a bottleneck. The computing device may determine that the userdevice, the network device, or neither device is negatively impactingthe network performance test.

As an example, the user device may have an expected maximum downloadspeed of 200 MB/s, the comparable network device may have a maximumdownload speed of 50 MB/s, and the network device may be connected to acommunications network that has a download speed of 100 MB/s. Thenetwork performance test may have a result of a download speed of 50MB/s. Since the communications network has a maximum download speed of100 MB/s, and the result of 50 MB/s is less than the maximum, and thecomputing device may determine that the network device or the userdevice is the bottleneck preventing the maximum download speed. Thecomputing device may evaluate the expected download speed of the userdevice and the maximum download speed of the comparable network deviceto determine if the user device or the network device is the bottleneckof the system. As stated above, the comparable network device has amaximum download speed of 50 MB/s, and the user device has an expectedmaximum download speed of 200 MB/s. Thus, the computing device may inferthat the network device is the bottleneck and is impacting the networkperformance test because the maximum download speed of 50 MB/s of thenetwork device directly correlates to the result of the networkperformance test. Therefore, the computing device may determine thenetwork device is negatively impacting the results of the networkperformance test.

The computing device can provide a recommendation on how to improve thenetwork performance test. For example, if the network device is thebottleneck, the recommendation may include information of how to updatethe software and/or firmware of the network device. The computing devicemay automatically update the software and/or firmware of the networkdevice and/or the user device to improve the network performance. Asanother example, if the network device's physical capabilities aremaximized, the computing device may recommend replacing the networkdevice with a newer device with better capabilities. As a furtherexample, if the communications network is the bottleneck, the computingdevice may recommend upgrading the internet service of the user deviceto improve the network performance test.

The recommendation from the computing device may include adjusting oneor more settings of the user device and/or the network device. Thesettings may include power settings, settings related to a number ofdevices permitted to access a network device, changing a channel ofoperation (e.g., 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, etc.), modifying the channel ofoperation (e.g., if 2.4 GHz, modifying to 2.412 GHz, 2.417 GHz, 2.422GHz, etc.), activating and/or deactivating a wireless extender,activating and/or deactivating traffic shaping (e.g., beamforming),controlling bandwidth allocations for one or more devices, controllingdownload and/or upload speeds for one or more devices, security settings(e.g., firewall, anti-virus), or any setting related to the operation ofthe user device, the network device, and/or the network. The computingdevice can automatically adjust one or more of the settings on thenetwork device and/or the user device in order to improve the networkperformance.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an example method 500. At step 510, a networkperformance request is received by a computing device (e.g., by thecomputing device 104) from a user device (e.g., the user device 102).The network performance request includes an identifier of the userdevice (e.g., device identifier 108) and an identifier of a networkdevice (e.g., identifier 118 of the network device 116). The request caninclude parameters for running the network performance test. Theparameters can indicate one or more preferences of a user of the userdevice for performing the network performance test. Parameters caninclude, for example, a location of the computing device performing thenetwork performance test, an expected speed of the network performancetest, a size of data to test, and a length of time to conduct thenetwork performance test. For example, the user device may indicate alocation of the computing device that the user device would like toperform the network performance test.

At step 520, a network performance test is performed by the computingdevice. The user device may receive and transmit data between thecomputing device. The computing device can determine a latency betweenthe computing device and the user device by sending a packet comprisingtime data to the user device to determine the length of time for thepacket to be received by the user device. For example, the time data mayinclude a universal time stamp that indicates the time the packet wassent from the computing device. The user device and/or the computingdevice can compare the universal time stamp in the packet to theuniversal time stamp at the time the packet was received to determinethe length of time the packet traveled from the computing device to theuser device in order to determine the latency. As another example, thetime data may include a local time stamp of the computing device. Uponreceiving the packet, the user device can transmit the packet back(e.g., reply, respond) to the computing device. After receiving thepacket from the user device, the computing device can then compare thecurrent local time with the local time stamp within the packet todetermine the length of time the packet traveled from the computingdevice to the user device in order to determine the latency.

The result of the network performance test may be the speed (e.g.,megabytes per second (MB/s)) of the transfer between the computingdevice and the user device. For example, the computing device maytransmit a predetermined size of data to the user device, and then basedon a length of time for the transmission to complete, determine resultsof the network performance test in terms of upload speed, downloadspeed, and/or latency. As an example, the result of the networkperformance test may be that the user device may achieve a downloadspeed 50 MB/s, an upload speed of 5 MB/s, and a 5 ms latency.

At step 530, a performance parameter of the user device and aperformance parameter of the network device are determined by thecomputing device. The performance parameter of the user device and theperformance parameter of the network device can be determined from theresults of the network performance test. For example, the computingdevice may search the database using the identifier of the networkdevice to determine a performance parameter for the network device. Theperformance parameter may be any parameter that impacts the networkconnection of the device. The performance parameter may be the maximumdownload speed and/or maximum upload speed of the network device. Thenetwork device can provide the performance parameter to the computingdevice. The computing device may use the performance parameter of thenetwork device, along with information about the communicationsconnection, to determine the performance parameter for the user device.

As an example, the performance parameter of the network device may be amaximum download and upload speed of 600 MB/s and the network device maybe connected to a communications network that has a download speed of200 MB/s. The network performance test may have a result of a downloadspeed of 150 MB/s. Since the communications network has a maximumdownload speed of 200 MB/s and the network device has a maximum downloadspeed of 600 MB/s, and the result of 150 MB/s indicates that the userdevice is the bottleneck preventing the maximum download speed.Accordingly, the computing device may determine that the performanceparameter for the user device is 150 MB/s. While a maximum downloadspeed is used for ease of explanation, a person skilled in the art wouldappreciate that any network performance parameter may be determined.

At step 540, the performance parameter of the user device is stored(e.g., in the database 114) by the computing device. The performanceparameter of the user device can be stored based on the identifier ofthe user device. The database may comprise crowd sourced data related toone or more of the user devices that have requested a networkperformance test.

At step 550, the performance parameter of the network device is stored(e.g., in the database 114) by the computing device. The performanceparameter of the network device can be stored based on the identifier ofthe network device. The database may comprise crowd sourced data relatedto one or more of the user devices that have requested a networkperformance test.

The stored data can be used to determine characteristics of theplurality of user devices and the plurality of network devices. Forexample, machine learning or statistical analysis may be applied to thestored data to determine operating characteristics of the plurality ofuser devices and the plurality of network devices. The stored data maybe processed to determine additional information related to theplurality of network devices and the plurality of user devices such asinformation related to how to improve a user's network connection,information related to users of the devices, the impact the devices haveon the network, and so forth.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing an example of an operating environment600 for performing the described methods. An example computer 601 may beconfigured to perform any of the methods and/or systems describedherein. By way of example, user device 102, the computing device 104, orthe network device 116 of FIG. 1 may be a computer as shown in FIG. 6 .Similarly, the methods and systems described may utilize one or morecomputers to perform one or more functions in one or more locations. Theexample of the operating environment provided is only an example of anoperating environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation asto the scope of use or functionality of operating environmentarchitecture. Neither should the operating environment be interpreted ashaving any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combinationof components shown in the example of the operating environment.

The present methods and systems may be operational with numerous othergeneral purpose or special purpose computing system environments orconfigurations. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments,and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the systems andmethods comprise, but are not limited to, personal computers, servercomputers, laptop devices, and multiprocessor systems. Additionalexamples comprise set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics,network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computingenvironments that comprise any of the above systems or devices, and thelike.

The processing of the described methods and systems may be performed bysoftware components. The described systems and methods may be describedin the general context of computer-executable instructions, such asprogram modules, being executed by one or more computers or otherdevices. Generally, program modules comprise computer code, routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that performparticular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Thedescribed methods may also be practiced in grid-based and distributedcomputing environments where tasks are performed by remote processingdevices that are linked through a communications network. In adistributed computing environment, program modules may be located inboth local and remote computer storage media including memory storagedevices.

Further, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the systems andmethods described herein may be implemented via a general-purposecomputing device in the form of a computer 601. The components of thecomputer 601 may comprise, but are not limited to, one or moreprocessors 603, a system memory 612, and a system bus 613 that couplesvarious system components including the one or more processors 603 tothe system memory 612. The system 600 may utilize parallel computing.

The system bus 613 represents one or more of several possible types ofbus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, aperipheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, or local bus using any ofa variety of bus architectures. By way of example, such architecturesmay comprise an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a MicroChannel Architecture (MCA) bus, an Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, a VideoElectronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, an AcceleratedGraphics Port (AGP) bus, and a Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI),a PCI-Express bus, a Personal Computer Memory Card Industry Association(PCMCIA), Universal Serial Bus (USB) and the like. The system bus 613,and all buses specified in this description, may also be implementedover a wired or wireless network connection and each of the subsystems,including the one or more processors 603, a mass storage device 604, anoperating system 605, network performance software 606, networkperformance data 607, a network adapter 608, the system memory 612, anInput/Output Interface 610, a display adapter 609, a display device 611,and a human machine interface 602, may be contained within one or moreremote computing devices 614 a,b,c at physically separate locations,connected through buses of this form, in effect implementing a fullydistributed system.

The computer 601 typically comprises a variety of computer readablemedia. Exemplary readable media may be any available media that isaccessible by the computer 601 and comprises, for example and not meantto be limiting, both volatile and non-volatile media, removable andnon-removable media. The system memory 612 comprises computer readablemedia in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory(RAM), and/or non-volatile memory, such as read only memory (ROM). Thesystem memory 612 typically contains data such as the networkperformance data 607 and/or program modules such as the operating system605 and the network performance software 606 that are immediatelyaccessible to and/or are presently operated on by the one or moreprocessors 603.

The computer 601 may also comprise other removable/non-removable,volatile/non-volatile computer storage media. By way of example, FIG. 6shows the mass storage device 604 which may provide non-volatile storageof computer code, computer readable instructions, data structures,program modules, and other data for the computer 601. For example, andnot meant to be limiting, the mass storage device 604 may be a harddisk, a removable magnetic disk, a removable optical disk, magneticcassettes or other magnetic storage devices, flash memory cards, CD-ROM,digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, random accessmemories (RAM), read only memories (ROM), electrically erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EEPROM), and the like.

Optionally, any number of program modules may be stored on the massstorage device 604, including by way of example, the operating system605 and the network performance software 606. The network performancedata 607 may also be stored on the mass storage device 604. The networkperformance data 607 may be stored in any of one or more databases knownin the art. Examples of such databases comprise, DB2®, Microsoft®Access, Microsoft® SQL Server, Oracle®, mySQL, PostgreSQL, and the like.The databases may be centralized or distributed across multiple systems.

The user may enter commands and information into the computer 601 via aninput device (not shown). Examples of such input devices comprise, butare not limited to, a keyboard, pointing device (e.g., a “mouse”), amicrophone, a joystick, a scanner, tactile input devices such as gloves,and other body coverings, and the like. These and other input devicesmay be connected to the one or more processors 603 via the human machineinterface 602 that is coupled to the system bus 613, but may beconnected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallelport, game port, an IEEE 1394 Port (also known as a Firewire port), aserial port, or a universal serial bus (USB).

The display device 611 may also be connected to the system bus 613 viaan interface, such as the display adapter 609. It is contemplated thatthe computer 601 may have more than one display adapter 609 and thecomputer 601 may have more than one display device 611. For example, thedisplay device 611 may be a monitor, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), ora projector. In addition to the display device 611, other outputperipheral devices may comprise components such as speakers (not shown)and a printer (not shown) which may be connected to the computer 601 viathe Input/Output Interface 610. Any step and/or result of the methodsmay be output in any form to an output device. Such output may be anyform of visual representation, including, but not limited to, textual,graphical, animation, audio, tactile, and the like. The display device611 and computer 601 may be part of one device, or separate devices.

The computer 601 may operate in a networked environment using logicalconnections to one or more remote computing devices 614 a,b,c. By way ofexample, a remote computing device may be a personal computer, portablecomputer, smartphone, a server, a router, a network computer, a peerdevice or other common network node, and so on. Logical connectionsbetween the computer 601 and a remote computing device 614 a,b,c may bemade via a network 615, such as a local area network (LAN) and/or ageneral wide area network (WAN). Such network connections may be throughthe network adapter 608. The network adapter 608 may be implemented inboth wired and wireless environments. Such networking environments areconventional and commonplace in dwellings, offices, enterprise-widecomputer networks, intranets, and the Internet.

For ease of explanation, application programs and other executableprogram components such as the operating system 605 are shown herein asdiscrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs andcomponents reside at various times in different storage components ofthe computing device 601, and are executed by the one or more processors603 of the computer. An implementation of the network performancesoftware 606 may be stored on or transmitted across some form ofcomputer readable media. Any of the described methods may be performedby computer readable instructions embodied on computer readable media.Computer readable media may be any available media that may be accessedby a computer. By way of example and not meant to be limiting, computerreadable media may comprise “computer storage media” and “communicationsmedia.” “Computer storage media” comprise volatile and non-volatile,removable and non-removable media implemented in any methods ortechnology for storage of information such as computer readableinstructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Exemplarycomputer storage media comprises, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM,EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digitalversatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes,magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices,or any other medium which may be used to store the desired informationand which may be accessed by a computer.

The methods and systems may employ Artificial Intelligence techniquessuch as machine learning and iterative learning. Examples of suchtechniques include, but are not limited to, expert systems, case basedreasoning, Bayesian networks, behavior based AI, neural networks, fuzzysystems, evolutionary computation (e.g., genetic algorithms), swarmintelligence (e.g., ant algorithms), and hybrid intelligent systems(e.g., Expert inference rules generated through a neural network orproduction rules from statistical learning).

While the methods and systems have been described in connection withspecific examples, it is not intended that the scope be limited to theparticular examples set forth, as the examples herein are intended inall respects to be possible examples rather than restrictive.

Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that anymethod set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps beperformed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim doesnot actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is nototherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that thesteps are to be limited to a specific order, it is in no way intendedthat an order be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possiblenon-express basis for interpretation, including: matters of logic withrespect to arrangement of steps or operational flow; plain meaningderived from grammatical organization or punctuation; the number or typeof examples described in the specification.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that variousmodifications and variations may be made without departing from thescope or spirit. Other examples will be apparent to those skilled in theart from consideration of the specification and practice describedherein. It is intended that the specification and examples be consideredas exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit being indicated by thefollowing claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: determining, based on anetwork performance request from a user device and network performancedata of a plurality of devices, at least one comparable user device ofthe plurality of devices and at least one comparable network device ofthe plurality of devices; determining a performance parameter of the atleast one comparable user device and a performance parameter of the atleast one comparable network device; and determining, based on theperformance parameter, that the user device is not negatively impactinga network condition.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the networkcondition comprises at least one of: an indication of an upload speed,an indication of a download speed, or an indication of a latency.
 3. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the plurality of devices comprises at leastone of: a quantity of access points, a quantity of user devices, aquantity of routers, a quantity of gateways, a quantity of modems, or aquantity of other devices in range of the at least one comparablenetwork device.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the networkperformance request is received from the user device, wherein thenetwork performance request comprises one or more of: a user deviceidentifier associated with the user device and a network deviceidentifier associated with the at least one comparable network device.5. The method of claim 1, further comprising causing an operationconfigured to improve the network condition.
 6. An apparatus comprising:one or more processors; and a memory storing processor-executableinstructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, causethe apparatus to: determine, based on a network performance request froma user device and network performance data of a plurality of devices, atleast one comparable user device of the plurality of devices and atleast one comparable network device of the plurality of devices;determine a performance parameter of the at least one comparable userdevice and a performance parameter of the at least one comparablenetwork device; and determine, based on the performance parameter, thatthe user device is not negatively impacting a network condition.
 7. Theapparatus of claim 6, wherein the network condition comprises at leastone of: an indication of an upload speed, an indication of a downloadspeed, or an indication of a latency.
 8. The apparatus of claim 6,wherein the plurality of devices comprises at least one of: a quantityof access points, a quantity of user devices, a quantity of routers, aquantity of gateways, a quantity of modems, or a quantity of otherdevices in range of the at least one comparable network device.
 9. Theapparatus of claim 6, wherein the network performance request isreceived from the user device, wherein the network performance requestcomprises one or more of: a user device identifier associated with theuser device and a network device identifier associated with the at leastone comparable network device.
 10. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein theprocessor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or moreprocessors, further cause the one or more processors to cause anoperation configured to improve the network condition.
 11. A methodcomprising: determining, based on a network performance request from auser device and network performance data of a plurality of devices, atleast one comparable user device of the plurality of devices and atleast one comparable network device of the plurality of devices;determining a performance parameter of the at least one comparable userdevice and a performance parameter of the at least one comparablenetwork device; and determining, based on the performance parameter,that the user device is negatively impacting a network condition. 12.The method of claim 11, wherein the network condition comprises at leastone of: an indication of an upload speed, an indication of a downloadspeed, or an indication of a latency.
 13. The method of claim 11,wherein the plurality of devices comprises at least one of: a quantityof access points, a quantity of user devices, a quantity of routers, aquantity of gateways, a quantity of modems, or a quantity of otherdevices in range of the at least one comparable network device.
 14. Themethod of claim 11, wherein the network performance request is receivedfrom the user device, wherein the network performance request comprisesone or more of: a user device identifier associated with the user deviceand a network device identifier associated with the at least onecomparable network device.
 15. The method of claim 11, furthercomprising causing an operation configured to improve the networkcondition.
 16. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors; and amemory storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed bythe one or more processors, cause the apparatus to: determine, based ona network performance request from a user device and network performancedata of a plurality of devices, at least one comparable user device ofthe plurality of devices and at least one comparable network device ofthe plurality of devices; determine a performance parameter of the atleast one comparable user device and a performance parameter of the atleast one comparable network device; and determine, based on theperformance parameter, that the user device is negatively impacting anetwork condition.
 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the networkcondition comprises at least one of: an indication of an upload speed,an indication of a download speed, or an indication of a latency. 18.The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the plurality of devices comprises atleast one of: a quantity of access points, a quantity of user devices, aquantity of routers, a quantity of gateways, a quantity of modems, or aquantity of other devices in range of the at least one comparablenetwork device.
 19. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the networkperformance request is received from the user device, wherein thenetwork performance request comprises one or more of: a user deviceidentifier associated with the user device and a network deviceidentifier associated with the at least one comparable network device.20. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the processor-executableinstructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causethe one or more processors to cause an operation configured to improvethe network condition.